Trent Alexander-Arnold has been voted as our player with the most potential. Which of our players had the most wasted potential?

by RaspberryLow2187

27 Comments

  1. Markovic, easily.

    He was hyped as one of the best talents in Europe at the time, but his issues with us largely didn’t stem from his lack of ability, but his mentality. This combined with a really poor time for us where we didn’t have the time or staff to properly develop him. Worst bit is that in the summer of 2015, he went to Galatasaray because he didn’t think he would get game time – only for Rodgers to get sacked and for Klopp to come in. He said it himself that once he had gone on loan, he was effectively gone to the club, and he would have had a much better chance of fighting for his spot if he had stayed.

    A really high potential that was unfortunately squandered.

  2. Robbie Fowler and for me it’s not even close.

    Here’s a guy who scored 18 in his debut season at 18 and then for the next 3 season banged in 30+ goals a season. 106 goals in 188 appearances in those 4 seasons. Left foot, right foot, with his head, in the box, outside the box, he just found the net. We named him God for a reason. The most naturally gifted goal scorer we have ever produced and who banged in a sub 5minute hattrick against Arsenal. He wasn’t some 1 season wonder, there were no ifs or buts, he had proved himself.

    Then it all went wrong. He was like 22/23 and he done his knee, fell out with Houllier and Thompson, shit like the spice boys and by 26 his best years had already been played out and we moved him on.

    Coming of the back of the 96/97 season we thought he would lead us to glory, break all the records, Rush’s heir apparent. At the time we were buzzing; in the likes of Fowler, McManaman, and Redknapp we had some the best young talent in the country. The demise of Fowler really epitomises the failed potential of that team.

    What could of been, but that’s football. I was about 11 when Fowler broke through and I will never forget the buzz he brought with him.

    Wasted potential sounds to harsh, unfulfilled is more accurate. 

  3. I’ll send what another user suggested: Sturridge.

    He was so good and clinical, shame how inuries ruined him.

    Bonus shoutout to AOC, he was looking great until his knee blew up.

  4. Because of the injuries, my mind went to Thiago. A true midfield maestro, but the universe just wouldn’t let him stay on the pitch.

  5. Sturridge, but it’s not his fault. If he didn’t have so many injuries he could have been one of the best strikers in the world, his partnership with Suarez was lethal

  6. sikamikanicookie on

    Thiago

    I know he wasn’t a prospect when we brought him but already a formed player, but man what a shame he was injured constantly.

  7. RayTheWorstTourist on

    Mark kennedy, the most expensive teenager in English football when we signed him. Definitely didn’t live up to the hype that was around him at the time

  8. Aggravating_Hope_567 on

    It’s unfair to rule a player as wasted potential because of injuries

    It boils down to attitude or unfulfilled potential

    Balotelli is walking proof of this

    Mentions to La Talac, Pongelle, Suso as youngsters brought in with great promise

  9. I’m thinking Sterling. Not because he didn’t reach his potential (he certainly did), but because he didn’t reach it with us. So for us all that potential might aswell have been wasted

  10. Nicolas Anelka, he could have been such a baller for us, he was on loan but Houllier decided to go for Diouf…

    Anelka was actually gutted he said in an interview that when he was at Liverpool he found a team that was like a family and it was exactly what he was looking for.

Leave A Reply