Q: Were you tempted to make your subs earlier as the game was turning?
A: Yeah I could have. But… all these things… are totally irrelevant to me. Substitutions and all those kind of things. If you're not competitive, it doesn't matter what you do, you're not going to get rewards, you don't deserve to win. We didn't deserve on our second-half performance, irrespective of subs or anything else, to get something out of the game. But I think if you do get something out of the game, you're falsely rewarded and I don't want to get falsely rewarded.
by Left-Peak-6899
4 Comments
Teaching moment for the lads for sure.
I’d rather we get “falsely rewarded”, pick up the 3 points (or 1 point) & then let Angry Ange flog them at training.
No one wants to be around an Angry Ange 24/7, some of them are actually lucky there’s an International Break happening.
Downvote me all you want but this is a really dumb thing for Ange to say. Subs are irrelevant? One of the few things a manger can do to directly impact a game and they are irrelevant?
And he didn’t make subs because he didn’t want the team to be “falsely rewarded” with a result? So perhaps he could have changed the result but it would have been a false reward?
Seriously folks. Take off your blinders for a minute and look at this objectively. Wtf is Ange on about?
Why must he give these bizarre rants filled with fake psychological babble as answers to straightforward questions